>I've been thinking of extending my lenses to include a 100-300 zoom. One >weakness of these seems to be softness at 300 mm. Sigma has a couple of >lenses that I find interesting: > >1. 100-300 f4. It's a constant aperture f4 and was reviewed well by Pop >Photo, but is big, heavy, and expensive. I carry a heavy camera bag as >it is.
I have stopped reading Pop Photo for at least two years, but for those that I read in the past, I can't remember any poor lens reviewed by them. My advise is, if you have other choice, stay away from Sigma. If you want a decent 300mm, go for a prime 300mm. regards, Alan Chan _________________________________________________________________ Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
