Photodo�s numbers are weighted according to their own peculiar system - when graphs are available they are reliable and more informative IMO. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Frantisek Vlcek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 28. joulukuuta 2001 4:44 Aihe: Re: We are sorry for any inconvenience >JT> Whatever happened to Photodo? They haven't updated in 18 months. (There >JT> I go, complaining again about a free service.) > >Joe, don't trust Photodo. If you have a friendly shop where you will >buy it or some other opportunity, just ask them to try the lens, take some >pictures. Try it for yourself. Photodo sucks (not always, but it's >that inconsistency... some of their graphs are pretty well sticking to >real performance, some are completely nuts - according to them, an A >70-210/4 is lot worse lens than the 70-200/4-5.6 zooms, and that's >just one out of many. And their numerical rating is not that related >to what counts. And lens tests... do you want to choose lenses to >shoot lens tests or real life?) > >Good light, > Frantisek Vlcek - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
