On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:05:57PM +0530, Subash scripsit: > On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:24:21 -0300 Luiz Felipe > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Gimp is not that bad program, but the setup I have can't work with > > 16 bits per channel images... so there goes a lot of image detail. > > Didn't bother looking for a different version, so maybe this issue > > is past.
Nope, still a GIMP issue. It's not something the primary dev team seems to consider a priority, though there are signs they're going for arbitrary bit depth innards in the future. > Luiz, both Cinepaint (no raw converter capability or plugins) and Ufraw plugins for CinePaint ship standard with most mainstream distros. You double-click the raw image, you get ufraw opening, and then you feed that (however adjusted) into CinePaint. > digikam support 16 bits per channel. And might be a less troubling interface than CinePaint if you're chiefly used to Windows apps. -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
