Thanks, Marnie. I could have climbed the fence and gotten a low shot from the near front corner of the house. Maybe I'll consider going back. I varied the light and fiddled with B&W, but this version simply best exposed the scene. As I mentioned in another post, I want this sort of subject to be well lit to allow a 'study' of its textures and detail.
Jack --- On Mon, 4/6/09, eactiv...@aol.com <eactiv...@aol.com> wrote: > From: eactiv...@aol.com <eactiv...@aol.com> > Subject: Re: PESO: Tarke Homestead > To: pdml@pdml.net > Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 10:54 PM > In a message dated 4/6/2009 4:28:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight > Time, > jdavi...@yahoo.com writes: > > JD> Beautiful calm 78F afternoon. Had to get out > and > > around for awhile. > > JD> Am including a link to a long since abandoned > > homestead on Tarke Rd. > > JD> So completely overgrown and impenetrable from > the > > front that I > > JD> had no option but this side view. > > JD> Seems I can't resist such remnants of the > past. > > > > JD> Jack > > > > JD> K10, DA60~45 > > > > JD> > > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=403 > > =========== > I think it's an okay photo, as is, Jack (sort of like > some okays I've shown > lately ;-)). But it might be really grabbing with > different light/angle. > > HTH, Marnie aka Doe :-) > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be > censored. > > **************Worried about job security? Check out the 5 > safest jobs in a > recession. > (http://jobs.aol.com/gallery/growing-job-industries?ncid=emlcntuscare00000003) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
