Thanks for the answer - it�s just what I thought. I�m happy with the MZ-S. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: Raimo Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 28. joulukuuta 2001 20:30 Aihe: Re: Vs: Re[4]: Aperature Ring On MZ-S >Raimo, > >Then it functions like an MZ-S that everyone is complaining about. >With the PZ-1p, you can ignore the aperture dial and do it like all >the other bodies by just spinning the aperture ring. > > >Bruce Dayton > > > >Friday, December 28, 2001, 12:02:13 PM, you wrote: > >RK> Hi Bruce, >RK> pardon me but I would like to know: what does the PZ-1p do when you take the >aperture ring off A? The only camera of the same generation I have owned was Z-20 and >with it you could control the >RK> aperture on the lens also (IIRC). >RK> All the best! >RK> Raimo >RK> Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen > >RK> -----Alkuper�inen viesti----- >RK> L�hett�j�: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >RK> Vastaanottaja: Artur Led�chowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >RK> P�iv�: 28. joulukuuta 2001 19:55 >RK> Aihe: Re[4]: Aperature Ring On MZ-S > > >>>Artur, >>> >>>Certainly to each his own. I have owned/used the following Pentax >>>bodies: MX, SuperProgram, ZX-10, ZX-M, PZ-1p and MZ-S. Of the bunch, >>>the *only* Pentax that doesn't use the aperture ring for aperture >>>priority is the PZ-1p. I have used a ZX-50, and because of lack of >>>aperture coupling (crippling it for older lenses), it requires pushing >>>the shutter collar back and forth. However, it doesn't have a >>>dedictated control for aperture vs. shutter, making it extremely >>>clumsy for manual mode. >>> >>>I suspect that since I have come from a long line (including Canon, >>>Olypus and Nikon) of aperture ring lenses for many, many years, I do >>>not find using the aperture ring as a problem. When I had my PZ-1p's, >>>I did use the thumb dial, but did not find it inherently superior to >>>the other method. Just different. >>> >>>I hope that in the future Pentax releases a camera that fits your >>>style. However, other than lower models, I suspect that the future >>>has been shown by the lack of success of the PZ-1p. With digital >>>looming, we may not really see much of anything beyond the MZ-S. >>>Perhaps the rumored LX II? But that certainly will not function like >>>the PZ-1p. >>> >>>Good luck in your quest. >>> >>> >>>Bruce Dayton >RK> - >RK> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >RK> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >RK> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
