Others, wiser than we, have already discussed this to conclusions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_confusion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_Field
Unless the changes made yesterday evening to the DoF listing were
mischievous PDMLrs.
:-)
On Apr 7, 2009, at 05:57 , Cory Papenfuss wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This is a simple issue. Bob is speaking of perceived depth of filed
on a viewed print. JCO is speaking of critical depth of field in
respect to the ability of a given lens to resolve detail. Both are
correct, but each is discussing an entirely different matter.
Let it go.
... but as I'm sure we will discover, only one is correct. ;-)
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
