2009/4/9 Larry Colen <[email protected]>: > I was frustrated at the DFA 100/2.8 macro running about $500 bucks, > but the Nikon seems to go for about $950. I often envy the low light > sensitivity of his camera, but I certainly don't envy what he has to > pay for glass. Granted, this lens has VR and an internal motor, both > of which would drive up the cost. I'm sure Dave could also enlighten > us on other benefits of Nikkor glass.
My Voigtländer 125mm f2.5 was considerably more expensive than that... As for Nikkor lenses, aside from the in lens VR (it's actually useful to see it working) I'm not overly impressed. Let me put it this way, I like Penatx for their glass I like Nikon for the body & flash system. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
