On Apr 21, 2009, at 01:54 , AlunFoto wrote:
2009/4/21 Patrick Nelson <[email protected]>:
Thanks for the answer. I agree with what you are saying but I think
my
question is as follows. Assuming I needed 1:1 to fill the frame on
film with
a specific subject I would obviously need to back off a bit and a
lower
magnification to fill the frame on digital with the same subject. I
would
now be working at less than life size would I not? Is this
difference also a
factor of 1.5 like on telephoto?
Yes. :-)
Jostein
Is it not also true that if you make an 8x10 from the film 1:1, and an
8x10 from the digital image, they will both show full size images, or
full "frame" and be essentially the same?
Or are we going to throw the resolution of the negative vs the
resolution of the sensor into the equation?
(I know that optically the image thrown on the sensor will be smaller
[x.667] than the image on the film)
Joseph McAllister
Lots of gear, not much time
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
