Well, well, well...
Great news, even if not a full scale scientific test. TKS!!
LF
Joseph McAllister escreveu:
Slapping some of my DA lenses on an LX I have not found any that didn't
cover the entire screen, with no apparent vignetting except at a zoom's
widest angles. Not scientific. Not all inclusive. Just an observation.
If I had the time, and I cared, I'd shoot a few rolls of film to test
each of my DA lenses. But I don't, so I won't. Maybe some other time.
On Apr 29, 2009, at 14:54 , Luiz Felipe wrote:
Guess they could sue me if I end up finding some DA lens CAPABLE of
marginal (but acceptable to some extent by me) 35mm coverage...
If I sell someone a PC that is not intended to video edition, has no
real video capability but the user stubbornly uses it to edit video,
I'm ok with that.
Let's accept the truth, handed from wherever by any means, that Pentax
offers no DA lens intended and guaranteed to work 35mm. My question
still remains: is there any experience proving lousy 35mm coverage by
said DA lenses? Since it's not the accepted use, I won't hold sacred
Pentax responsible for my results... they will be my entire
responsibility. All mine.
Joseph McAllister
[email protected]
“If I could tell the story in words, I wouldn’t need to lug a camera.”
–Lewis Hine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
