For me, with FF 28-85 is normal, so under 28 is short and over 85 is long. With aps digital, change the numbers to <18 as short and >55 as long.
Now if your talking long TELE, it would be over 200 for FF or over 135 for APS. YMMV, JC O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) "Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of AlunFoto Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:53 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Interesting DA 60-250mm test shots 2009/4/30 Graydon <[email protected]>: > > 250mm is long? That's not reliably enough even for feeder birds. > > The 60-250 struck me when I heard about it as a good zoo lens, but it > isn't what I'd even start to call long. > > -- Graydon, who figures 800mm is pretty short, most of the time If 800 mm is pretty short most of the time, then you spend most of the time too far away from your motifs, sir. Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
