Those were not your original statement as quoted here. > > "For those who have not been following this Challenge, it all started when I told someone on the list I had never seen an inkjet print that I though matched a photographic print. He said I had not seen one of his. I replied, send me one. He didn't, but Aaron said everybody should send me one.">>
In a message dated 1/1/2002 4:14:25 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Subj:Re: Winners (PDML 2001 Printer Challenge) > Date:1/1/2002 4:14:25 AM Central Standard Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> > Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > > Hey who's running this? You, or me? Besides, it was a digital printer > challenge, not an inkjet printer challenge. Furthermore, according to the > rules, which I made up, I am the final authority on the prize winners. ;-) > > Ciao, > graywolf > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:47 PM > Subject: Re: Winners (PDML 2001 Printer Challenge) > > > > I don't want to pee on anyones parade, especially on New Years, but the > Xerox > > Tektronics Phaser 850 is NOT an inkjet printer. So, I am not sure that > > printer is eligable for the reknowned inkjet printer challenge, despite > its > > superb performance. Seems only fair to compare apples to apples, so to > > speak. See the attached homepage for tech info on that printer. > > > > http://www.officeprinting.xerox.com/cgi-bin/profile.pl?popup > > > > Jerry in Houston > > > > In a message dated 12/31/2001 9:20:46 PM Central Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > > Subj:Re: Winners (PDML 2001 Printer Challenge) > > > Date:12/31/2001 9:20:46 PM Central Standard Time > > > From:HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-to:HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To:<A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> > > > Sent from the Internet > > > > > > > > > > > > I left that out? Canon Photo Pro Glossy. > > > > > > Ciao, > > > graywolf > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:21 AM > > > Subject: Re: Winners (PDML 2001 Printer Challenge) > > > > > > > > > > Tom, nice work on the "Challenge". What kind of paper did the > > > > grand prize winner Mike Nosal use? Congratulations to the > > > > winners! > > > > Steve Larson > > > > Redondo Beach, California > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Pentax Discussion Malling List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 11:26 PM > > > > Subject: Winners (PDML 2001 Printer Challenge) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here are the winners of the PDML 2001 Printer Challenge. > > > > > > > > > > For those who have not been following this Challenge, it all > started > > > when > > > > I > > > > > told someone on the list I had never seen an inkjet print that I > > > though > > > > > matched a photographic print. He said I had not seen one of his. I > > > > replied, > > > > > send me one. He didn't, but Aaron said everybody should send me > one. > > > And > > > I > > > > > said if they do I will post a list of printer ratings based on > those > > > > prints. > > > > > To prime the pump, I said I would confer upon the senders best > three > > > > prints, > > > > > based on my opinion, the title of "PDML 2001 Master Digital > Printer". I > > > > > mentioned this to the area Pentax Rep and he offered to donate some > > > Pentax > > > > > memorabilia as prizes. > > > > > > > > > > So there are basically two phases to this challenge. > > > > > > > > > > One, a compilation of printer ratings based upon prints sent to me > by > > > list > > > > > members. The rating for a given printer is based upon the best > print > I > > > > have > > > > > received that was printed on that particular model printer. I will > give > > > > the > > > > > current ratings in another post. This list of rating is an ongoing > > > thing > > > > and > > > > > I will post them monthly. > > > > > > > > > > Two, this contest, based upon my purely subjective rating of the > prints > > > I > > > > > have received. The winner's have been selected from those who had > sent > > > me > > > > > prints postmarked on or before December 15, 2001, and were made > from > > > the > > > > > submitter's original photos. Names of the prints have been assigned > by > > > me > > > > > for my convenience. Prizes will be mailed about the end of the > week. > > > > > > > > > > These three winners may add the sig line "2001 PDML Master Digital > > > > Printer" > > > > > to their PDML posts. You won it, flaunt it. > > > > > > > > > > So here are the WINNERS! (Drum roll please, maestro). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Third Prize (Winner of the Pentax PMA Lapel Pin featuring the > MZ-S). > > > > > Kathy Leickly --Autumn Trees > > > > > > > > > > Xerox Tektronix Phaser 850. No details > > > > > > > > > > Because I like it! Kathy sent three identical photos, one done on > an > HP > > > > > Deskjet 722C, two done on the Xerox (one on plain paper, one on > glossy > > > > photo > > > > > paper). My selection for third place is the one done on the glossy > > > photo > > > > > paper with the Xerox. The Phaser printers are what Tektronics used > to > > > call > > > > > solid state laser printers that use a block of toner instead of > powder. > > > > > Kathy says he blocks are wax like. The resulting print has a kind > of > > > oil > > > > > painting like look to it. Strangely the print on plain paper is > shinier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Second Prize (winner of the Leather Pentax Keycase). > > > > > Paul Stenquist --Maple Leaf > > > > > > > > > > Epson Photo 1200, printed from a 4800dpi scan using an Agfa > Duoscan > > > 2500 > > > > T > > > > > from a transparency taken with a Pentax LX and a Vivitar Series 1 > > > 90/2.5 > > > > > Macro. > > > > > > > > > > Paul's print is on Ilford Inkjet Matte Fine Art Paper. The maple > leaf > > > > seems > > > > > to glow. This paper hides printer defects, but give an almost > painting > > > > like > > > > > print. Certainly the print is worthy of hanging on the wall. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Grand Prize (winner of the Pentax Swiss Army Knife). > > > > > Mike Nosal --Column > > > > > > > > > > Epson 1270, printed at 480dpi, from a scan made on an Imacon > Flextight > > > > > scanner. Taken with his Pentax ZX-7, and a "F" 80-200 lens. > > > > > > > > > > Mikes print of the details of a column is an example of a print > that > > > will > > > > > show every defect of the printer. Large areas of monotone show any > sign > > > of > > > > > banning or unevenness. The column is about 90% white which will > clearly > > > > show > > > > > up any halftoning. It shows very little of any of those problems. > What > > > it > > > > > does show is that it is worthwhile to use a higher res image than > is > > > > usually > > > > > claimed to be optimum. Mikes superb print shows that today's inkjet > > > > printer > > > > > can do very high quality work. > > > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > > > > graywolf > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - > > > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget > to > > > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > - > > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > - > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
