I wouldn't. I hope to someday have both lenses. Of course a 400/4 would be nice:-).
Paul
On May 15, 2009, at 7:29 AM, AlunFoto wrote:

I've compared the AOV. Don't think I'll sell my 300 just yet.

Jostein

2009/5/15 Tim Øsleby <[email protected]>:
This and other photos, has made me wonder how this performes compared
to the DA* 300.
I like the 300 a lot, but a good zoom is a lot more versatile. Hm.
Can't afford a change now. But some day, maybe.

--
MaritimTim

2009/5/15 paul stenquist <[email protected]>:
Grace at the park. 250mm, f5.6, ISO 400:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9184392

100% detail of Grace at the park:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9184395


And a drive by shooting of a Canada Goose (through the open car window)
f5.6, 200mm, ISO 400:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9184396


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.




--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to