Flash sync speed is still not confirmed. It may be 1/250.
Noise reportedly is quite better. We'll see.

K-7 is top of the line, do not expect much better from the K200/K20
replacement, it will be lower end.
Maybe better video but forget about fps and fast shutter speeds.

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> This camera sounds good, although I'm disappointed with the flash synch
> speed. But if low light autofocus and autofocus speed in general are much
> improved, it's a major step up. The frame rate is also a big plus. But I may
> wait to see what the K30D offers. That camera is reportedly due later this
> year. I don't see the K7 as a game changer over the K20D, so I wonder if
> it's meant to be the flagship. In any case, I'll wait a bit, but if it seems
> that it won't be surpassed by another release very soon, I'll buy it and get
> rid of my K10D.
> Paul
> On May 18, 2009, at 6:53 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:47:50PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:36:53PM -0400, John Francis scripsit:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:22:00PM -0300, Luiz Felipe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ricehigh.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks interesting indeed... :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> LF
>>>>
>>>> So - what are the perceived strengths & weaknesses?
>>>>
>>>> Strengths, as I see them:
>>>> o  Metal body shell
>>>
>>> Why is this a strength?
>>>
>>> More expensive, not as strong, and conducts more heat than the
>>> polycarbonate.  It might be a strength if you expect a 20 year working
>>> life and want something that won't become brittle when it runs out of
>>> elastomers, but that's not true of a digital camera.
>>
>> Stiffness.
>> I'm sure heat conduction isn't going to be an issue (there's an
>> outer skin of polycarbonate, after all, and the camera is cold-
>> weather certified).  But unless they're building the body out of
>> carbon fibre it's not going to be as stiff as one with a metal
>> shell.  The total lack of body flex is one of the things that
>> I noticed when I got to play with a high-end CaNikon.
>>
>> And I *do* expect close to a 20-year working life out of this.
>> My *ist-D still works just fine after 5.5 years; I expect it
>> to make it at least to 10.  My old Canon PowerShot G1 is still
>> delivering images (albeit now in the hands of its second owner),
>> and that's over eight years old.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to