PJ, take a look at this picture: http://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_fang/3544426674/in/set-72157618438434400/
That lens is a 50-200 "WR". On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:57 AM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > Your're not looking in the right place, (God's forgive me for this), visit > RiceHigh's page, he either has a photo showing the "New" 50-200mm DA, (with > 49mm filter ring), including a mount view sporting a bright orange O-ring, > or has a link to it. I can't remember which, and ya' know one visit to > RiceHigh's site in a decade is more than enough... > > Tim Øsleby wrote: >> >> Take a closer look at the pictures Peter. >> >> The first picture shows us the lens front, it says DA 1:4.5,6 50-200mm ED >> WR. >> WR in blue writing, >> >> So I'd say it is a strong assumption :-) >> >> > > > -- > -- > > The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or > drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a > damn fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is > not a free man any more than a dog. > > --G. K. Chesterton > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- ~Nick David Wright http://www.nickdavidwright.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
