Not conclusions, just feelings. I found very disappointing the sample
shots on Pentax' site. I remember the old D300 sample shots that were
shocking me and now seeing these shots to me it seems that the K-7 is
worse than the K20D. I am not saying K-7 is bad or good but most of the
"all other features" you mention are a, Box-Features; b, fixing
weaknesses (marked them in your list). The VF and 100K Shutter are nice :)
I just expressed my feeling about the K-7 which was a dissapointment for
me. I still have traces of the "I WANT ONE" fever but... oh, you know :)
And still... the sample shots on the site sucks. And _that's_ really
disappointing.
Again... I am not here to argue, to convince or judge anything or
anyone... I just had a feeling about the K-7, based on all the info I
got, which I wanted to share... :) So don't take it as an offense please
;) (Why so serious? :D)
Regards,
.timber
Thibouille wrote:
a HDR,
a contrast AF /Face detection,
* built-in level and auto level with SR,
b dampened mirror/shutter;
b fps,
b copyright credits on recorded images,
b completely new metering,
* 100% viewfinder,
* shutter certified for 100,000 actuations,
a stereo sound in video using an external mic,
b AA batteries possibility with grip,
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
