Hmmm...I shoot lots of weddings each year, along with lots of paid
portraits and family groupings - almost always flash fill.  The 1/250
would be nicer, but the 1/180 is not a deal breaker for me.  I
generally set the flash to handle high speed and then watch my
shutter speed - using ISO somewhat to help control things.  Not a
huge issue, just a small nice to have, in my book.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Thursday, May 21, 2009, 8:48:32 PM, you wrote:

AM> John,

AM> This is a real issue for wedding shooters and anyone doing
AM> location/outdoor portraiture (or any other sort of mixed
AM> daylight/flash work, which Paul obviously does). Flash sync does
AM> matter and Pentax continues to offer the only camera in-class with a
AM> sub-1/250 sync (the 40D/50D, D300, E-3 and A700 all offer the better
AM> sync speed).

AM> -Adam

AM> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:43 PM, John Poirier <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This is catastrophic!  My retirement plans were entirley based on selling
>> backlit protraits of  hummingbirds to microstock agencies!!!  I've really
>> had it with Pentax.  There are lots of real pro systems that will give you
>> perfect shots of everything at the push of a button, and I'm gonna get me
>> one real soon.  Right now I'm kinda busy fixing the light leaks in my Zenit
>> E..
>>
>> ---- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: Oh another K-7 thread...
>>
>>
>>> You're missing the fact that the amount of flash exposure you can work
>>> into a shot is dependent only on the f stop. So if I shoot a backlit
>>> portrait outdoors at f5.6, 1.250th, I can fill flash in at that 5.6 value.
>>> If I'm forced to stop down to f6.7 because I can't go beyond 1/180th in
>>> shutter speed, I lose flash exposure and increase DOF. Ideally, I'd like to
>>> have flash synch up to 1/1000th, but that's  complex and cost;y. And
>>> high-speed synch doesn't help much, because  the flash power is greatly
>>> diminished by multiple firings.
>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> Of course, with hummingbirds, it's even worse. Why, at 1/180th, the
>>>> hummingbird's wings have gone through a whole 38% of a stroke. With
>>>> 1/250th,
>>>> that'd be reduced to a mere 28%.
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>>






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to