Im not talking about the current or near future lenses, Im talking about the long run. It only makes sense that things that can be corrected in the body rather than with optics may be cheaper way to go but you would have to use new bodies only with those optically uncorrected lenses.
JC O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) "Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of paul stenquist Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:56 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: CA correction on the K-7 The new DA* lenses display much less CA on a digital sensor than do any of my A, M, SMC or FA lenses. Your concern smacks of deep paranoia. Paul On May 21, 2009, at 7:06 PM, JC OConnell wrote: > Im afraid in camera correction may be an excuse for them > to start putting out uncorrected lenses that require > new bodies to perform properly. Wouldnt be that bad if > the lenses got real cheap, but will they? > > JC O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) > "Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas > Jefferson > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > Matthew Miller > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:47 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: CA correction on the K-7 > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:57:37PM -0400, John Francis wrote: >> Apparently (from posts on the DPReview forum) this takes *several >> seconds* per exposure. Sounds hard to believe, but if this is true I >> guess it's not all that useful. > > Yeah, seriously. Although the in-camera raw conversion can still do > it. > If the feature turns out to be debilitating 3-4 seconds downtime > after I > click would definitely cause me to miss shots. On the other hand, > maybe > I can learn turn it on sometimes simply to force myself to be more > deliberate in my shooting. :) > > -- > Matthew Miller [email protected] <http://mattdm.org/ > > > The Definitive Pentax P-TTL Flash Model Guide: <http://pttl.mattdm.org/ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
