Your description makes it sound as if you pulled off detail that wasn't
even there.....
You'd have to see the prints to appreciate. What is easily noticed is the
sharpness attained with the digital print compared to the typical commercial
B+W print of 50 or so years ago ! I'm normally very careful in the
application of unsharp mask & it was during this step that the 'magic'
happened.
The details in the original were more precisely defined.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike wilson" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: K20D as Scanner
---- Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
The results are simply astounding ! Its hard to believe the final results
came from the 50 year old original - much clearer and sharper. I
seriously
doubt if wet prints off the original negs would even come close to the
digitally produced images.
Your description makes it sound as if you pulled off detail that wasn't
even there.....
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
