G'day Bob I really like No. 3. Very symmetrical.
I suspect the originals are probably sharper and more vibrant than the Photo CD scans. I always found Photo CD scans very "hit or miss" (more often "miss"). That said, they were economical and certainly better than using the slide adapter on my old Epson flat bed scanner. Is that Lantana a native plant there? In Australia Lantana is a curse - invading natural bushland and eliminating countless hectares of native vegetation. Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ On Sat, 23 May 2009 13:41 -0500, "Bob Sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote: > Here are some more butterfly photos...from film. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9235091 > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9235115 > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9235073 > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9235087 > > > With th PZ-1 and A100/2.8 macro from Kodak CD scan > > Comments and critiques welcome. > Regards, Bob S. > > -- -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
