On Mon, 25 May 2009 10:31 -0600, "Bran Everseeking" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009 16:01:59 +1000 > Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The 35-70 will be > > equivalent to about 52-105 due to the sensor being smaller than 24mm x > > 36mm size of 35mm film. If you need wide angle, you will need a new > > lens. > > the 35-70 will still be a 35-70. no extra reach is created
Yes, I understand that. It's a peeve of mine too. I thought using the qualifying term "equivalent to" correctly explained the situation. Doesn't it? Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > I know most know its a crop factor not a tele increase but it has > become a pet peeve. I think the delusion is a selling point. > > -- -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
