On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 03:05:53PM +0200, AlunFoto scripsit: > 2009/5/28 Graydon <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:01:57PM +0200, AlunFoto scripsit: > >> 2009/5/27 Graydon <[email protected]>: > >> > Only if you can't move the sensor forward. > >> > >> Through the shutter lamellae? :-) > > > > Two shutters, one 35mm, one 645, the 35mm stacked behind the 645 shutter > > like the inner jaws of moray eels. They'd have to be able to move > > relative to each other in complex ways. > > Complex indeed. :-) > > And the 35mm shutter would have to be before the 645 shutter. :-)
Not if it was two sets of left and right shutter halves; they could move out of each other's way, depending on camera mode. :) The 645 shutter could be fixed to the body; the sensor and the 35mm shutter would have to be able to move through it in "parked" configuration, and the 35mm shutter parked configuration would have to be wider than the 645 image area. I figure we don't have to be concerned for such a scenario unless we hear that Pentax has partnered with a traditional Swiss watchmaking company. -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
