Hi Leon. Pleasure to help, I think the only real advantage I have with the 16-50 is the f/2.8 aperture, even the distortion is similar.
Regards, john ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leon Altoff [[email protected]] Sent: 30 May 2009 21:48 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Lens considerations Hi John, Thank for the link, it's interesting to compare the 2 lenses on paper. It looks like they should produce similar quality images which is what I wanted to know. -- Leon 2009/5/30 John Whittingham <[email protected]>: > Hi Leon > > There's a full test on the 17-70 at the following URL: > > http://www.photozone.de/pentax/408-pentax_1770_4 > > I was at one point thinking of selling my DA*16-50 and buying one new, the > 20-35 still fetches good money on Ebay, not sure about the 28mm shift. > > Regards, > > John -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
