The noise is a result of backlit exposures being tweaked a bit in post. I probably should have shot both at ISO 200 and upped the exposure a bit, but when shooting continuous action that moves from one lighting scheme to another, I sometimes have to settle for whatever numbers I've dialed in previously.
Paul
On Jun 2, 2009, at 2:16 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:

Paul, both this shot and the previous one you posted (on the roller
coaster?!) seem to have a measure of noise in them. At ISO 400 it is
somewhat unexpected. Anything you have to say on the matter?

Aesthetically, I've nothing to say - you're as steady as ever. In all respects.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected] > wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9277895&size=lg

DA* 60-250, K20D, f5.6 @ 1/1500th, 220mm, ISO 400

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.




--
Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to