We went to the cinema last night, and there were several times during the movie I noticed the photography. Nice colors, lighting, composition, good use of depth of field, and so forth. It was very visually appealing.
But, the movie was "Up". It was completely computer generated, which makes calling it photography somewhat problematic. However, judging it by exactly the same standards as one would judge photography, it was still very pleasing. I'm honestly not sure whether the closing credits were filmed, computer generated, or a mixture. The dof of the credits were weird, with the edges and the top of the screen sharp, and the middle and lower middle less so, I couldn't tell if that was camera work, computer generated to get you to read the top of the screen, or just due to things being misaligned in the theater. As to the movie itself, Pixar did it again. It's a good story, a fun movie, and the computer animation raised the bar on the state of the art. -- The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post the wrong answer. Larry Colen [email protected] http://www.red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
