If my sample of this lens is representative, then this lens will be a 
somewhat controversial performer. Here are some characteristics.

It's very very sharp. It is indeed not that sharp wide open but still 
better than any other lens I've tried at apertures of 1.8 and faster. I did 
the test at a landscape focused at infinity. Therefore, there might be some 
focusing errors as I suspect that the lens focuses slightly past the 
infinity mark. I cranked the focusing ring ever so slightly away from where 
it stops at the infinity setting. Focusing bracketing is probably a good 
idea for more thorough testing.
The lens sharpens up considerably half a stop from wide-open; at 2.4 yields 
a sharp image. At 2.8 the results are very very sharp; perhaps the best 
performance I've seen at this aperture. Its better than both the 43 and 77 
Limited at 2.8.
It reaches maximum performance from F: 4 to F:8. There might be an increase 
in quality from F: 4 to F: 8 but it is so small and inconsequential that 
I'm not sure I see it at all. Theres a small image degradation at F:11. A 
further one at F:16 and F: 22 but even at F: 22 it is sharp.

However, the lens suffers from two "problems": Severe light fall-off at the 
corners that doesn't really get away until F:4. In fact, this lens has the 
severest light fall-off I can remember seeing. Its very visible at wider 
apertures.
In addition, it show reduced edge sharpness at apertures wider than F:4. 
This is also clearly visible; the lens does indeed have a sweet spot in the 
center in terms of sharpness.
I have not tested out the bokeh but I expect it to be excellent.

P�l
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to