Perhaps it /is/ possible to have too many lenses.
John Francis wrote:
Hah. For a day or two I wasn't able to put my hand on my A* 300/2.8,
which is a heck of a lot larger. You might think it would be hard to
lose track of something like that, but you'd be wrong.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:46:10PM +1000, Brian Walters wrote:
Even at my stage of mental decay, if I had a smc tak 105 2.8, I'm sure I
would never forget where I had left it....
:-)>
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:45 -0400, "David J Brooks" <[email protected]>
wrote:
you know you had the smc tak 105 2.8 in one camera bag, moved it
somewhere else but can't remember
where.
Dave
--
--
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
