On Friday, January 4, 2002, at 09:01 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > (I also think you really > nailed the exposures on both of these.)
The barn is a touch over on the transparency. :) > Were they off a tripod? I blew > them up to 300%, and while that causes them to pixelate, I can still get > a feel for how much detail there is in the wood and wall textures. Nope, all three were hand held. The barn in particular has a lot of detail, but in the window shot you can almost read the headline on the newspaper when blown up from the 4000dpi scan...but it also shows that the very back of the window is a little soft. :) > I tend to > favor the 35 over the 28 in 35mm landscape photography, so perhaps I > should go for this lens before I buy a 55/4. That $750 price tag seems > quite reasonable. I quite like the perspective of my old Super Tak 35mm f2.0, which is why I was attracted to the 75mm. Also, the fast maximum aperture and excellent (for medium format) minimum focus distance and small size and light weight made me positively lust after this lens. The price seems quite reasonable, too. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
