It was a well written article, but the author didn't mention film type selection . . . could that have added to either lenses final results? (I think I know the answer, but I thought I'd put it out there.)
Illinois Bill Dan Scott wrote: > > When I saw the side-by-side of the two test shots, I could hear Paul Hogan > (a la "Crocodile Dundee") saying, "You call that a transparency? That's not > a transparency, now THIS, this is a transparency". Whoosh. :-) > > Dan Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Mark wrote: > > > >I just *love* the side-by-side photo of the 67II with the 600/4 next to the > >Canon with the 300/2.8! > > > >Anyone who doesn't feel enabled by this article needs medical attention! > > > > > >-- > >Mark Roberts > >www.robertstech.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
