Yes, these are interesting, but the noise reduction settings are not
disclosed, making the comparison meaningless.
It was observed on another forum that Pentax seems to be boosting
saturation in high ISO images. You can see that in the crayons especially.
The best comparisons for me would be RAW files with noise reduction off.
Joe
-----
Imaging-resource already has a few.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
2009/7/7 Joseph Tainter <jtainter at mindspring.com>:
> The main feature of the K7 that I find attractive is the claim that it
> produces less noisy images at high ISO settings. So I wonder if it is
> actually better than the K20D (which I consider to be pretty good up to
> about ISO 2000).
>
> Would anyone who owns both the K7 and the K20D be willing to take
some high
> ISO comparison shots and post them (actual size) where we could look at
> them?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.