well, a quick stopgap would be a 24mm lens from Pentax. If you could get two instead, then the 20 and 28 should do the trick.
-- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) Home Page - www.jchriso.com Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list - http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Desjardins, Steve Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 8:49 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: My current prime lens A-Team Some great typos here. that would be the FA 50 1.4 and the FA135 2.8. I guess it can't be a misspelling if it's numbers, can it? ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Desjardins, Steve [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 8:47 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: My current prime lens A-Team I have this problem now. I have: DA14 DA40 FA10 1.4 A50 2.8 macro FA 100 2.8 macro FA125 2.8 K 300 4 I desperately need some prime lenses between 14 an 40. The 40 is bit too long in many cases and need a shorter normal. I often use the FA20-35 but I would like to get the DA21 and something in the low to mid 30's. one good results was that the FA 135 suddenly became a most useful lens with the DX format. ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of J.C. O'Connell [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 5:45 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: My current prime lens A-Team well, there are exceptions to every rule I guess, but in general the further you get away from 50mm ( 33mm on digital ), the less often you are going to need it. That's why they call normal normal. -- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) Home Page - www.jchriso.com Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list - http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Graydon Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 4:54 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: My current prime lens A-Team On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:33:07PM -0400, J.C. O'Connell scripsit: > On Pentax digital, you are most likely going to get a lot more use out > of a 135,200, or 300, than the 400. 400mm is just very very long on > digital and will rarely be needed. Unless you do birds, in which case 400mm is awfully short. -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
