Yes, after seeing what the DA* 300/4 can do I'd buy a DA* 200/2.8 in a heartbeat, if I could afford one right now.
John ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of paul stenquist [[email protected]] Sent: 27 July 2009 02:23 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: My current prime lens A-Team Yes, but the DA* is a good lens. I would think it's probably the best value you'll find in a fast 200. Paul On Jul 26, 2009, at 9:01 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote: > And if you can find one, Pentax made a K-200 ƒ2.5 back in the day. > Probably a shitty lens. 77mm filter size. > On Jul 26, 2009, at 14:46 , paul stenquist wrote: > >> Pentax makes a DA* 200/2.8. That's quite fast for a lens of that >> length, and anything faster is going to be very large and very >> heavy. And very expensive. > > Joseph McAllister > [email protected] > > I couldn't remember most of what I know today > if it weren't for others sharing their knowledge > of my past on the Internet. Thank you… > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
