Actually, it's so thin it only has one side.

J

--- On Tue, 7/28/09, Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Brian Walters <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: DA 16-45 f4 -- does it require "slim" filters?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 6:37 AM
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:00 -0700,
> "Jack Davis" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Actually they mean "thin" filters. Narrow filter
> ring.
> > 
> 
> 
> Yeah - the 'slim' filter is built into the camera....
> 
> :-)>
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Brian
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Brian Walters
> Western Sydney Australia
> http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
> 
> 
> > Jack
> > 
> > --- On Mon, 7/27/09, Christine Aguila <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Christine Aguila <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: DA 16-45 f4 -- does it require
> "slim" filters?
> > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> > > Date: Monday, July 27, 2009, 9:31 PM
> > > I use the 16-45 regularly and have
> > > only a 67mm UV filter on it.  I have never had
> any
> > > vignetting problems because of this UV filter. 
> Cheers,
> > > Christine
> > > 
> > > P.S.  What's a "slim" filter?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> -- 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 


      

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to