David J Brooks wrote:
:-), made my day.
Nice fill flash and subtle water mark.
Side note, i notice a big difference in fill flash quality from the
K10D and D200. The latter wins for me.
Dave
In the interest of full disclosure, it was a combo of flash fill _and_
that nice little photoshop feature
in a drop down menu in elements 5 called "Shadows/highlights" where I
used a sliding bar to darken the
highlights and lighten the shadows... but on the whole, the fill flash
on my darkside baby does work very nicely..
The PS adjustment would have gotten much too grainy (ooops, I mean
"noisy" ) if I had not used the flash at all.
thanks all youse who like the shot - you know who you are ... :-) if I
start typing names I'll leave someone out
ann
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:39 PM, ann sanfedele<[email protected]> wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2526444_XRhmm/1/605204756_NNdqW/Original
I think the flash fill worked on this... I seldom use flash.. always shoot
in raw.
adjusted brightness/contrast in shadows/highlights box
also using new watermark - hopefully you will hardly notice it.
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
