The end user is the final QC. That's true of every manufacture these
days. Read the Canon and Nikon Fora if you think their QC is any better.
Joseph Tainter wrote:
I'm starting to think of those lens plants near Hanoi, the assembly
plant in the Philippines, and perhaps Pentax as a whole as something
like the Iraqi army. It's just never going to straighten itself out.
I was hoping that Hoya was going to correct these problems, but
apparently not.
Joe
Their reservations are:
1. Price
2. Lousy Pentax QC again--they had to try 3 samples before they got
one with an
even focus plane, and not even that one would work on all Pentax bodies.
When they recommend Smegma ahead of Pentax, you know there's a problem.
Sheesh.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Bruce Walker <[email protected]>
> Subject: DPReview vs the DA* 55 1.4 SDM
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 9:24 AM
> dpreview.com has released their full
> review of the Pentax smc DA* 55mm 1:1.4 SDM lens ...
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/pentax_55_1p4_p15/
>
> Much moaning about AF; loved the lens hood. :-) General
> agreement that it's much improved in most ways over the FA
> 50.
>
> Recommended (with reservations)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
