On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:43:45PM -0400, Doug Brewer wrote: > Larry Colen wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:39:25AM -0400, Doug Brewer wrote: > >>Not a terribly original idea, I know, but it may be of local interest at > >>some point, and it's certainly in interesting photographic possibility. > >> > >>so, http://www.alphoto.com/images/whatwehaveleft/ > > > >I see that you're one of those people who feel that if someone doesn't > >have flash installed on their computer, they aren't good enough to see > >your photos. > > > > > > which I guess makes you one of those people who think it's cool to trash > people who don't think flash is evil.
It's not so much that flash is evil, which is a whole 'nuther discussion, but that flash is non-standard. I recognize that there are benefits to flash, but if that is the only way to view something, then you'll prevent people who for whatever reason don't have it. If your goal is to allow everyone to see your pictures, but still provide the flash of flash, you could point to something like your annsan gallery, which would have a link to the flash gallery. I think that the other way wouldn't work, when flash doesn't work, you don't get anything. Your hypothesis also missed the other obvious possiblity being that I'm one of those people who is just a cranky bastard. -- The first step is learning to take great photos, the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good. Larry Colen [email protected] http://www.red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
