Thanks Marnie, I tried straightening and stretching this one a bit. I had actually pointed the camera down a bit, to get less sky. As a result, the buildings leaned a bit into the composition. The tall John Hancock Building on the right is also a fooler. It is not square, the sides slope inward. Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:03 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In a message dated 8/31/2009 3:42:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9719320 >>> >>> FA43 limited at f5.6 and 1/800th with ISO 200 on the K-7. >>> >>> Great detail in the original, but less so as processed for the web. >>> The 43 limited is a fine lens. More pictures later... >>> >>> This month, after 30 years, we are 'Empty Nesters'. >>> #2 son moved out (for the 2nd time) and 'The Daughter' moved >>> into the city for work & an MBA program. This is the view >>> from the condo she is renting. > > ============== > Like it a lot, Bob. Cough, looks a little crooked to me, though. I think > mainly on the left side. But nice composition of buildings and nice sky and > nicely sharp. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > > --------------------------------------------- > We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we > created them. Albert Einstein > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
