I wrote:
Thinking about an ideal solution, starting from scratch, I think m4/3 + FF is even better. It allows even more benefit in size and weight, with little if any sacrifice on performance. That wasn't true in the past, as 4/3 equipment was not smaller than APS-C, while its quality was. Lately, for some reason IQ of 4/3 sensors/electronics has improved more than APS-C, while m4/3 has finally brought out the small system Olympus promised for ages.
Get it right, please. Above I don't mean that m4/3 IQ is better than APS-C. I wrote it has improved more, approaching APS-C as never before.
Dario -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
