Why is it that we seem to part with the better cameras, and keep the worse ones?

Years ago I bought a second Super Program (Super A)--a lovely specimen in 
like-new condition--to complement my existing Super Program, which looked as 
though it had been in a series of street fights.

Guess which one I gave to my niece as a graduation present? (along with an 
A50/1.7)

The first one looks as though it has been in =even more= street fights, and 
still works fine.

Rampant sentimentalism.  Godders need not apply.

Rick

http://photo.net/photos/RickW


--- On Wed, 9/9/09, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Paul Stenquist <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Ode to an MX
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 11:47 AM
> I sold my best MX, but kept a really
> nice one with a broken meter. Looks good on the shelf:-).
> Paul
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Christian wrote:
> 
> > I too shed a tear for the 3 MXen I sold including the
> MX Date Back...  sigh.
> > 
> > --
> > Christian
> > http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
> > 
> > Luiz Felipe wrote:
> >> Reading your post made me think twice about
> selling the second Mx body. Too bad it's already shipped
> out... :-(
> >> At least I still have one. Guess I'll be taking it
> out tomorrow, instead of the Ds.
> >> lf
> >> Scott Loveless escreveu:
> >>> About a year and half ago, I guess, I loaned
> my MX to my wife's cousin
> >>> for a B&W course.  He needed a metal,
> mechanical, manual camera and
> >>> already had a couple K-mount lenses.  I
> didn't want to part with it,
> >>> but my K1000 was the only other camera I had
> that met his needs and
> >>> she has significant sentimental value. 
> So the MX took a trip,
> >>> courtesy of the USPS.
> >>> 
> >>> After a couple months of nothing, I finally
> sent him a message asking
> >>> about the camera and he replied with something
> like "Meter doesn't
> >>> work, found a K1000 to use."  So I
> replied with "Send it back and I'll
> >>> try to get it fixed."  No response.
> >>> 
> >>> Fast forward a few months.  Family
> gathering.  He's going to be there.
> >>> "Bring the camera," says I.  "Will do,"
> says he.  He doesn't.
> >>> 
> >>> A few months later, and another family
> event.  His Mother is going to
> >>> be there.  "Give it to your Mom." 
> "OK, I will."  He doesn't.
> >>> 
> >>> I gave up on ever seeing my preciousss again.
> >>> 
> >>> Last month.  Wife's Grandmother's
> birthday party.  He's there.  He has
> >>> my camera!  Sure enough, the meter
> doesn't work.  The batteries were
> >>> inserted correctly, but the LEDs just flash
> randomly.  I brought it
> >>> home and put it in the closet.  "Maybe
> I'll send it off for a CLA."
> >>> 
> >>> Last week I got it out and put some film in
> it.  Then I twisted the
> >>> aperture ring back and forth about 3 dozen
> times, really fast.  And
> >>> now the meter works.  4 or 5 rolls later
> and I've decided to never
> >>> lend any cameras to anyone ever again. 
> Ever.
> >>> 
> >>> I've apologized to the old girl a few times,
> and now she seems happy
> >>> to be, once again, nestled next to the K1000
> in the Domke.
> >>> 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 


      

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to