That's what a couple of us suspected. Down the line a bit, they may sell a few 
"L" copies simply because some won't remember the "L" designation as applying 
to the kit version.

Jack

--- On Sat, 9/19/09, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: P. J. Alling <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: PESO: Pigeon Secrets
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, September 19, 2009, 10:21 AM
> You won't get much of a bargain as
> the L series is a Kit lens only.  
> You'll have to get the standard 55-300 unless you're
> planning to buy a 
> K-x as well.
> 
> Jack Davis wrote:
> > I get it, Gradon. My reaction to the "L" release of
> the 55~30 was, also, that it would be less expensive.(?)
> > Speaking strictly from an IQ standpoint, $350 for the
> 55~300 was a heck of a buy. I made the decision to pick one
> up upon reading IQ reviews. FWIW, most explicit of which was
> that of Pop Photo who's SQF tests produced results rated
> significantly higher than those of the DA* 300 f/4. 
> Sample deviations notwithstanding.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > --- On Sat, 9/19/09, Graydon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> From: Graydon <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: PESO: Pigeon Secrets
> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Saturday, September 19, 2009, 8:13 AM
> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 08:03:27AM
> >> -0700, Jack Davis scripsit: --- On
> >> Sat, 9/19/09, Graydon <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>     
> >>>> Jack Davis scripsit:
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Thanks, Dave. Seems a quite capable
> bargain
> >>>>>       
>    
> >> lens.
> >>     
> >>>> The DA 55-300 isn't a bargain lens; it is
> >>>>         
> >> remarkably capable.
> >>     
> >>>> I'm quite pleased that Pentax seems to
> have
> >>>>         
> >> decided to produce a kit
> >>     
> >>>> lens version; the 50-200 (which I have
> never
> >>>>         
> >> owned or used) is
> >>     
> >>>> reported as being really quite good
> optically,
> >>>>         
> >> but the combination
> >>     
> >>>> of the extra reach and the colour
> rendition out
> >>>>         
> >> of the 55-300
> >>     
> >>>> strikes me as a better first impression to
> be
> >>>>         
> >> making.
> >>     
> >>> My use of the word "bargain" is a reference to
> it's
> >>>       
> >> price belying its
> >>     
> >>> capability. Not a criticism.
> >>>       
> >> Didn't think it was a criticism.
> >>
> >> Sigma 70-300 f4-f5.6 APO DG Macro is currently 330
> CAD at
> >> Henry's.
> >>
> >> Pentax 55-300 f4-f5.8 is currently 500 CAD at
> >> Henry's.  For a while
> >> there, it was a lot closer to twice the price;
> Sigma seems
> >> to have
> >> raised the prices on all the non-Sigma lens mount
> >> versions.  (The Sigma
> >> version is still at 280 CAD, rather than 330
> CAD.)
> >>
> >> So I was objecting to the "bargain" part; for the
> segment
> >> it is aimed at
> >> (consumer longish zoom), the DA 55-300 is actually
> pretty
> >> expensive.
> >>
> >> On the other hand, Henry's also has the K-x, the
> DA-L
> >> 18-55, and the
> >> DA-L 55-300 on for 1,000 CAD as a bundle. 
> The K-x and
> >> the DA-L 18-55
> >> bundle is 700 CAD.  So it looks like either
> Hoya
> >> really wants to sell
> >> K-x kits or the DA-L version of the 55-300 is much
> cheaper
> >> than the DA
> >> version.  (I am betting on the latter.)
> >>
> >> So at 300 CAD, and presuming no unfortunate
> tendency to
> >> mechanical
> >> failure, the DA-L 55-300 is unquestionably a
> bargain. 
> >> (And can I just
> >> say how much I wish someone at Pentax had changed
> the
> >> series letters,
> >> instead of adding that L?)
> >>
> >> -- Graydon
> >>     
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with
> either eating or drinking; he can ruin himself with
> gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn fool, and he
> might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is
> not a free man any more than a dog.
> 
>     --G. K. Chesterton
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 


      

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to