Same here- your photos are somewhat washed out on my calibrated NEC. I use NEC branded eyeone for calibration and it works well. --Sasha
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Boris Liberman <[email protected]> wrote: > P. J. Alling wrote: >> >> I've sometimes wondered at some of the comments I get on my PESOs. I know >> my monitor isn't professionally calibrated, I took the Adobe Gamma, (yes I >> know doing it by eye isn't the optimal a solution ), as a starting point >> then adjusted it until it matched the output from my printer. So I get >> acceptable more or less repeatable prints. However I just looked at my >> recent PESOs on a (probably uncalibrated) LCD on a public computer and boy >> there's a huge difference between what they look like on my HITACHI >> SuperScan (CRT).. I take back all the bad thoughts I had about what seemed >> to be needlessly nit picking comments. > > Peter, I humbly suggest that you do buy yourself a calibration tool, even > cheap Spyder at its most basic configuration will improve the quality and > repeatability of your workflow. > > Indeed, your most recent b/w shots are looking pretty flat on my monitor. It > is Philips Brilliance 200W LCD screen that is profiled with Spyder. > > In fact, I was going to suggest to you that you send me one your PEFs or > DNGs so that I can have a shot at processing them, but you kind of outran me > here with this message. > > HTH > > Boris > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
