Same here - I still struggle with vernacularity. Perhaps one of the more versed vernacularists could enlighten me? The definitions I found on the web point more towards involuntarily funny - is that it? Cheers Ecke
2009/9/30 P. J. Alling <[email protected]>: > In case anyone wants to submit a shot for the October PUG the submission > page is still up. I guess Scott is a little behind. [and yes I just > submitted my entry, I'm a.) a little behind too. b.) couldn't decide i) what > I wanted to submit. ii) couldn't decide what the heck vernacular really > meant in a photographic context. iii) all of the above] > > -- > > > The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or > drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a > damn fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is > not a free man any more than a dog. > > --G. K. Chesterton > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
