Doug FWIW, as I edit my slides, I accumulate "keepers", and when I get 20 or more, I then take them in for scanning to a Photo CD. There is absolutely no need to have an entire roll of film scanned to a Photo CD at one time. I have had conversations with the local service that scans for me, and apparently a number of customers at this service get entire rolls scanned at once regardless of the number of keepers, a costly/dumb way to go IMHO. Ken Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:14 PM Subject: Re: Inexpensive Photo Scanner v. PhotoCD
> A big reason I don't do PhotoCDs is that I don't want to pay to have > images scanned that aren't "up to snuff". My average "keeper" rate is > one or two frames per roll, at most. I don't want to pay to have the > other ten, twenty, or thirty frames scanned. > TTYL, DougF - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
