On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:03 AM, AlunFoto <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/10/3 Tim Bray <[email protected]>: >> >> On the other hand, it would appear that if if you've got a K20, the >> K-7 gets you the exact same image quality, plus video, in a nicer >> package. Which is a tough sell for $1000+. > > I agree. As long as we only measure the two cameras on image quality and > video. > > If you include the other specs the toughness goes away. > > Jostein
I have no use for video, but faster AF would help me out a lot. I tend to lose a lot of shots with the K10 do to its slow hunt and peck AF. Thus the keeping of the Nikon stuff. Dave > > > -- > http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ > http://alunfoto.blogspot.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
