On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:56 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fernando" > Subject: Re: pef vs dng > > > >> I'm just stating that, as of today, shooting DNG >> restricts you from usign the full universe of raw converters out >> there. > > There are a lot of advantages to DNG. For my particular case, I weighted the advantages of DNG vs it's cons and it didn't work for me, extra space and ~at the time~ no support from the Raw converter of my preference is enough for me;
> So what if I miss out on a raw > converter that I will never use? And how good can it be if it doesn't offer > support for open source raw files? > I mean really, it's not like they have to reverse engineer to support DNG. The fact that a raw converter doesn't support DNG doesn't make its output worse. Maybe they want you to buy a new version each time you buy a new camera; maybe they are envious of Abobe, whatever reason they have doesn't change the fact that I prefer their simpler interface and the fact that I can easily get more detail out of my images ~and I've seen couple of reviews that agree with that statement. Tomorrow I can change my mind and pay little pentalty. > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
