On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:35:10 +1100 Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15/10/2009, eckinator <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2009/10/14 Subash <[email protected]>: > > > > > > a bit late on this but, nevertheless, here we go... > > > > > > +pc off+ > > > for a nazi, i am sure you can do better ]=) > > > +pc on+ > > > > there is no answer to that. I abstain. > > I apologize for prompting that response. > > However, to be fair, it's not difficult to find offical reports > indicating the significance of copyright and other Intellectual > Property Rights infringement in China. perhaps. but that is part of a larger possible debate about international trade practices and law and whether they've ever been fair to everybody concerned over the last two centuries or so. there is room for different, equally valid views there and i certainly don't want to get into that... though, personally i would say your way of stating the 'problem' is, hmmm, a lot more non-prejudicial? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
