---- David Savage <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/10/26 John Sessoms <[email protected]>: > > From: David Savage > >> > >> 2009/10/26 mike wilson <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> > > >>> > ---- David Savage <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> >> 2009/10/26 mike wilson <[email protected]>: > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > David Savage wrote: > >>>>> >> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >> G'day All, > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> Now we move onto the swimwear section of last weekends workshop: > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4039475415/> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> Direct link (~160kb) > >>>>>> >> >> <http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2542/4039475415_7aac997385_o.jpg> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> D700, 24-70mm f2.8 @ 50mm, 1/500 @ f4.5, ISO 100. Natural light > >>>>>> >> >> + gold > >>>>>> >> >> reflector. > >>>>> >> > Rather a sad excess of plastic... > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Don't you believe it Mike. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > I'll need to see the lack of scar tissue.... > >> > >> Well I didn't take any photos, but I did get a good enough look at > >> said lovelies to know that they are very real. > >> > >> This is a situation where the right choice of top has complemented her > >> assets rather well. > > > > Pose and camera angle add to the illusion. It'd be 10 out of 10 if it didn't > > have the blown highlight. > > Not that I disagree, but what is it about the blown highlight that detracts?
For me the facial one is not so bad but the way her right arm just appears from, apparently, nowhere is really unsettling. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
