OTOH, the photographer is also a sexual being who will, typically, find one sex 
more attractive than the other.  The photographer will not be able to 
completely prevent their own sexual perspective from affecting their 
reaction/composition for male and female models.   My objectification of any 
model is an unavoidable part of "reducing" them to an image.  The extent to 
which this is sexism depends on the typical reaction of the viewer.  If a gay 
male photographer objectifies a male model is it sexist?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 10:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!


In a message dated 10/31/2009 11:39:51 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
"Portraying someone as  a sexual being first and a person second" sounds 
more like objectification  than sexism. And objectification is something 
we do all the time, especially  we photographers. We silhouette people in 
images and instantly make them  objects (shapes, forms).  We use shots of 
random individuals to stand  for a general case or symbol -- objects  again.


==========
Actually, objectification IS sexist. Sexual  objectification anyway. It is 
ONE of the definitions of  sexist/sexism.

Just a comment. Not telling Dave not to post. (Though a  few more man shots 
would be good. I like having sexual objectification on the  other foot now 
on then, just for the sheer unusualness of it.)

Marnie aka  Doe ;-)

---------------------------------------------
We can't solve  problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we 
created them. Albert  Einstein  


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

!SIG:4aee58f976082773946649!


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to