On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Martin Trautmann wrote: > >> Von: Bran Everseeking <[email protected]> >> Betreff: a Pentax article in a daily read blog > >> http://photocritic.org/the-case-for-pentax/ >> >> not a bad article > > Hm, it's more a kind of an apology to Pentax customers, although it does not > sound as that much of a recommendation. It's more a kind of advertisment, > including to tell Pentax to pay them for another round of advertisment. > That wasn't my take on it. It's just a rambling, poorly written blog. Apparently, the writer forgot to mention Pentax in a previous entry and feels a need to compensate. He takes to a bit of an extreme, but I can't see where he is requesting anything of Pentax. Standard web fare.
Paul > And obviously they just added Pentax to C and N, even more than Sony/Minolta, > but ignored Olympus completely. Maybe that's right if 4/3 will move further > to Micro Four Thirds, away from DSLR to electronic viewfinder - but up to > then there's some more competition within this field. Since the author took > care to mention some of the 3rd party lens manufacturers, I wondered about > the miss on Olympus. > > The article lacked most of a perspective how CNP are set up for the future, > considering e.g. the new Pentax mother - I feel that's more important than > the minor chance of a pro level mid format Pentax system to come, or not. > -- > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
