> > I just know you're doing this too. I saw the email about > next year's annual + gallery + trip to Chicago, bowed > ritually in the direction of the God-like organizers, and > later that evening, I had to take the quickest-possible trip > through all the 2009 photos thinking "Well, maybe" and > tossing those into a "PDML-candidates" > folder/collection/whatever-your-workflow-calls-it. > > Then I took one pass through tossing the ones that were great > concepts but lame photos and ended up with... 39. > > What's your number? > > And I was wondering if it'd be A Good Thing if we each posted > a gallery of our "Top X Candidates for PDML 09" and heaped > praise on each others' winners (while throwing judicious dung > at each others' > Well-Meaning But Unfortunate Mistakes). Because getting down > to 3 is going to hurt. -T
If all 39 are equally good then it doesn't matter which three you send. See if you can find some sets of 3 that work particularly well together, then try and rank the sets. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
