On Jan 3, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:

> On Jan 3, 2010, at 06:32 , Adam Maas wrote:
> 
>> Pentax offers nothing truly comparable to the 58 Nokton, the FA 50/1.4
>> handles worse (particularly for manual focus, the Nokton has a large
>> and well damped focus ring) and has significant QC problems with
>> recent production and the DA* 55 is about twice the price of the
>> Nokton and both are shorter lenses in a range where smaller focal
>> length differences remain noticeable.
>> 
>> At the wide end Pentax is lacking any fast glass wider than 31mm.
>> While Pentax lenses are excellent, Pentax really has not provided a
>> full lens line unless your needs are small but slow primes and/or f2.8
>> zooms.
>> 
>> -Adam
> 
> 
> 
> You consider the DA 14mm ƒ2.8 slow?
> 
I was wondering the same thing. Any fast and wide lens will be somewhat large. 
But I think the 14/2.8 is a good compromise. That being said, I get by with the 
12-24/4. It's a bit slower, but it's also wider than the 14 and very good.
Paul
> Joseph McAllister
> Lots of gear, not much time
> 
> http://gallery.me.com/jomac
> http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to